The 2009 NFL season kicked off on Thursday of last week, and a rare Monday Night Football double header concluded week one last night. Both the New York football teams secured wins, and gave fans their first positive signs for the upcoming year.
The Giants- The Giants began their defense of the NFC East title with an important divisional victory against the Washington Redskins. Dominant defense and solid kicking led the G-men to a 23-17 win.
Offense- The Giants began the season with a solid, if not spectacular, ofeensive game. Eli Manning threw for 256 yards, with one TD and one interception. He hooked up with second-year receiver Mario Manningham on a nifty catch and run, with Manningham tight-roping the sideline for a 30-yard score. Steve Smith was his favorite target in this game, catching 6 balls for 80 yards. First-round pick Hakeem Nicks was injured in the game, and had to leave with a sprained foot. Overall, it seems that Manning still has to establish a repore with all his receivers, but the emergence of Boss and Smith as solid options when a completion is needed was nice to see.
On the ground, the Giants were not able to muster much, and the team also suffered to loss of third RB Danny Ware. Ware injured his elbow on the opening kickoff, and was not able to play for the rest of the game. Ahmad Bradshaw ran 12 times for 60 yards, and Brandon Jacobs had 16 carries for 46 yards. The Redskins huge offseason acquisition was Albert Haynesworth, and he always clogs up the middle on defense.
Lawrence Tynes, who has recleimed the starting kicker job he lost last season after injuring himself, was perfect on three field goals and two extra points. Two of his kicks bent nicely through the uprights after starting wide-right, suggesting that Tynes has a good handle on the often tricky winds at Giants Stadium.
Ovwerall, this was a decent effort on opening day, against a Redskins team with a solid defense. Look for the Giants to continue to grow in sync as the games progress.
Defense- On defense, the Giants showed what could be a formidable 11-man squad. Osi Umenyiora announced his return as a dominant defensive player with a bullrush from the edge, strip of Skins QB Jason Campbell, fumble recovery, and 37-yard runback for a TD. Osi missed last season with an injury, but showed signs of returning to his All-pro form with 3 tackles, a sack, and the aforementioned fumble-touchdown. While Umenyiora was out in 2008, Justin Tuck emerged as a star, and he showed no signs of slowing. He had four tackles and 1.5 sacks, combining with Osi to cause havoc from the edge. Corey Webster, who got involved in a pushing/wrestling match with Santana Moss, picked off Campbell and looked good in coverage.
The giants added several weapons for new defensive coordinator Bill Sheridan, who replaces the departed Steve Spagnuolo. The variety of looks which the Giants can throw at an opposing offense, combined with the rotation of highly-skilled players, allows them to have fresh players coming at the opposing QB from all angles throughout the game. The Redskins only offensive score came on a fake field goal from Washington punter Hunter Smith.
The Giants limited the Redskins to 272 yards of total offense, and the game was not as close as the final score would indicate.
Overall- The Giants should be pleased with their effort in the first game out, but there are still areas to clean up. The running game needs to establish itself, and the team needs to take care of the ball better. Eli fumbled twice, and was picked off. The Giants will head into Dallas next week, and will need their offense to handle some of the load, as the Cowboys offense looked good against Tampa. However, I was happy to hear Brandon Jacobs stoking the fires for this rivalry, when he was heard on the radio saying “the Cowboys receivers looked good, especially when they were wide open.”
I’m ready for a good game next week.
September 15, 2009 at 11:34 am |
I thought Eli looked excellent, except for the pick. The fumble was BS — blatant facemask. It’s all on Eli this year. Teams are gonna stack the box and make him beat them (like the skins did). If he can be a little bit more consistent with his throws, he and the no-name receivers should be up to the task. And Manningham looked fantastic. I’m looking forward to seeing more of him. These guys are gonna make mistakes, but they should get more separation than Toomer and Plax the last couple of years. The passing game could surprise.
Webster had an incredible game. Just shut down Moss the whole game. The injuries at corner are starting to concern me, however. And damn that Chris Canty is huge. That D’line is good.
September 15, 2009 at 11:37 am |
I think the receivers will be a “whole greater than the sum of the parts” type deal. Manningham, Smith, Boss, Hixon, hell even Barden can all play, and I think the lack of a spotlight receiver means the D has to guess instead of double.
September 15, 2009 at 12:58 pm |
Agreed. Not sure if Barden is ready to do anything this year, but Nicks is if he’s healthy. And don’t forget about Travis Bekham.
September 15, 2009 at 1:16 pm |
Is he the TE from wisc? I don’t know much about him.
September 15, 2009 at 1:52 pm |
Yes. And very athletic with excellent hands, but undersized. And I still think Moss can play, though I don’t know whether Reese and Coughlin agree.
September 15, 2009 at 1:57 pm |
I have a 10 point lead in fantasy, with 19 days to go. The trade deadline has passed, and I am out of free agent moves. The second place team has 3 moves left. I’m just hoping that I am not 7 1/2 up with 17 to go.
September 15, 2009 at 2:37 pm |
Lol, there are some moves out there depending on how deep your league is. I fought my way from 11-12 to 6th with pickups of Morales and Scott Feldman.
My football team is 1-0:
QB: Peyton (backup- Campbell)
RB: LDT, Thomas Jones, McGahee, Reggie Bush
WR: Cotchery, Roy Williams, Percey Harvin, Hixon, Chris Chambers and Manningham
TE: Owen Daniels
D: Titans
K:Nate Kaeding
September 15, 2009 at 2:57 pm |
My friend Cliff is in 3rd because I told him to pick up Scott Feldman and Jeff Niemann. But how the hell was Morales on the waiver wire?
I have 5 healthy players on my 6-man bench, and back-ups for every position except first base. I should be ok unless Adam LaRoche gets hurt. If he does, I’ll be playing shorthanded the rest of the year.
No football team this year. My league since 92 disbanded last year b/c the commish was unavailable for the draft, and the commish didn’t bother to put it back together this year. The highlight shows and in-game breaks are much less exciting without a fantasy team.
September 15, 2009 at 5:29 pm |
Other games in general. I was glued to the computer with pic-in-pic on the TV
September 16, 2009 at 2:56 pm |
Interesting fact of the day: Danny Murphy, who allegedly “sucks”, has 45 extra base hits this year. Derek Jeter, who is being touted the AL MVP in the NY media, has 45 extra base hits on the year. In fairness to Jeter, he does have a lot more at bats than Murphy, plays in a hitter’s park, has more protection in the lineup, and is not a virtual rookie.
September 17, 2009 at 7:08 am |
Interesting fact- Danielle Murphy, despite his excellent footwork which puts some in mind of Fred Astaire, butchered his play at first base with a tie game in the 9th and allowed the Mets to lose their 83rd game.
When reached for comment, Murphy said “I’ve got to make that play,” “I booted it and tonight we lost the ballgame.”
September 17, 2009 at 12:41 pm |
Stand up kid. Gotta like the attitude.
All things considering, he’s had a pretty decent rookie year. Has hit well after that awful early season. And while he has made his share of mistakes at first, his defense has surprisingly good. He’ll be a good defensive first baseman in time. And I think that if they leave him alone and let him play there every day next year, he’ll hit .290 with 40 doubles. But I suspect that they will panic and feel a need to get a HR bat at first.
September 17, 2009 at 1:17 pm |
Guys with 40 doubles hitting .290 this year:
Billy Butler- 52 doubles, .299
Adam Lind- 46 doubles, .297
Dustin Pedroia- 44 2B, .295
Robby Cano- 42 2B, .320
Mick Markakis- 42 2B, .299
Pablo Sandoval- 41 2B, .322
Miguel Tejada- 40 2B, .301
Kendry Morales- 40 2B. 304
so Murphy joins the company of these guys? Or how about the guys soon to be there?
Brian Roberts- 52 2B, .288
Evan Longoria- 43 2B, .276
Mark Teixiera- 40 2B, .286
Andre Ethier- 40 2B, .283
Albert Pujols- 39 2B, .333
Hanley Ramirez- 39 2B, .357
you got Murphy slotting in right next to those scrubs?
I think you might be going a bit lofty in your projections…
September 17, 2009 at 1:19 pm |
And let’s not forget:
David Wright- 33 2B, .315
September 17, 2009 at 2:32 pm |
So lets break this down.
He has 33 doubles thus far as a virtual rookie, who hasn’t played every day, and who has played in an injury-depleted lineup that offers him no protection. He’s a big kid who starting to learn to pull the ball. How does that not project to potential 40 double power? If he had played everyday this year, he would probably be closing in on 40 already.
He is a career .272 hitter who skipped AAA and had very limited minor league experience before being called up to the majors. He is a line drive hitter, with a good eye, who makes contact. How does that not project to a potential .290 hitter?
I’m not saying he’s a future star, but I’d be happy with paying my first baseman $400,000 next year to put up the kind of numbers I think Murph can put up — .290 with 12-15 homers, and a lot of doubles. Especially when the kid is a real grinder.
September 17, 2009 at 2:59 pm |
Im using real life examples of players who put up the stats that you project for Murphy. Do you believe that he will be in the class of these hitters? its fine to say that what you have seen of him leads you to believe that he COULD do what you project, but I am asking, based on the company he would keep of players who HAVE accomplished the feat, do you consider him in that class?
I am saying that 40 double, .290 hitters tend to be some of the better players in baseball.
How about this…
Carlos Beltran, your boy, has NEVER had a 40/.290.
Carlos Delgado has gone 40 and .290 once.
But a .258, .711 OPS season suggests to you that Murphy will….
September 17, 2009 at 3:17 pm |
No you’re not. Those players do other things Murphy won’t do such as hit 30-40 homers or steal bases.
Why do you doubt that he is capable of improving after his rookie season? Because he’s a Met rather than a Yankee?
September 17, 2009 at 5:32 pm |
Actually I am listing almost every player who has put up the numbers you are projecting for a “virtual rookie”. The same guy who you put up next to Derek jeter who does “other things Murphy won’t do” like collect 200 hits score 100 runs hit .330.
But hey, only you can pick and chose. I’m just a biased Yankee fan who can’t be objective…
September 17, 2009 at 9:10 pm |
I never compared Murph to Jeter. Come on. Just pointed out that a player who “sucks” has the same number of extra base hits as Jeter. That sucky player is 2 for 2 tonight.
September 17, 2009 at 10:22 pm |
A double and a homer tonight for Murph.
September 18, 2009 at 7:15 am |
Dude, you din’t say “Murphy has a lot of extra-base hits, as many as Jeter, Youklis and Cuddyer.” You pointedly put him up against Jeter, backhanded his MVP candidacy, and gave a list of reasons why Murphy’s extra-base hits are more impressive given his circumstances. I know its all in fun, but don’t pretend like it wasn’t a subtle knock on Jeter.
And I gotta say, a double and a homer in a 7-3 loss is whistling in the wind, especially at this point in the season.
September 18, 2009 at 9:00 am |
It wasn’t a subtle knock on Jeter (he’s having an excellent year, but not an MVP year), but a direct knock on the fools in the media (Michael Kay, et. al) promoting his MVP candidacy and on the anti-Mets people in the media beating up on Murphy this year. Murph has had a solid rookie year, especially under the circumstances of a very difficult season for the entire team and with his defensive issues and changing of positions. And since you have repeatedly stated that “Murphy sucks”, I thought I would point out that he now has more extra base hits (47-45) than your future Hall of Fame shortstop, who is having an MVP season in the distorted eyes of many. The only people I have heard say anything positive about Murph’s season and potential are Ron Darling and Brandon Tierney on ESPN.
As for Jeter’s MVP candidacy (and I think you agree with me here), he’s as credible a candidate for MVP as Lyndon Larouche is for president. Jeter does not belong anywhere near that discussion, and his presence in that discussion should help you understand why people like me who actually respect him are often compelled to “knock” him. Mauer is the MVP. If he loses to Jeter, the award will be forever meaningless in my eyes — like the all-star vote. And Tex, Miguel Cabrera and Kendry Morlaes are all far more worthy of the award than Jeter, to name just a few off the top of my head.
September 18, 2009 at 9:17 am |
Well, I agree Mauer has the best numbers, and his team getting into the race certainly helps. I think there is an aspect of the MVP vote that takes games played into account. Could hurt Mauer if he has great numbers on an 80 something non-playoff team. The award is always tricky.
I think Jeter got jobbed in the 99 and 06 races, and people in the NY media are using that as a crutch for his candidacy. Not valid in my eyes. He is simply having a great season on the best team in baseball. Prob not the MVP. Kendry Morales is not far more deserving however.
People need to divorce the media perception and subsequent backlash on
Jeter from his actual play. He has the most hits in baseball since 1995. Thats not an accident. He is a WS MVP. He elevates his play on the big stages. It is as invalid to overhype Jeter as it is to knock him as a result of that hype.
September 18, 2009 at 9:24 am |
Would this be a good rookie year, considering your evaluation of Murphy?:
G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS
140 496 444 62 123 27 1 12 63 10 2 41 54 .277 .339 .423 .763
Here is Murphy in comparison:
141 507 461 54 121 34 3 10 56 4 2 36 64 .262 .312 .414 .726
September 18, 2009 at 9:41 am |
He is a career .317 hitter, who has a career average of .309 in the post season with 49 rbi in 495 post-season at-bats. So does he really “elevate his play on the big stages”? I think not. He is an excellent player who has played as an excellent player should play on the big stages. The notion that he is this great clutch player is plain silly. I don’t buy this “clutch” bullshit in baseball. I believe that guys are “unclutch”, but not “clutch.” If he is able to “elevate his play” in big situations, then when internal flaw prevents him from elevating his play at all times and thus becoming an even better player? He is just an excellent player. Nothing more. Why can’t that be enough?
I don’t understand the voter’s difficulty in comprehending the meaning of “value.” The most valuable player in the league is not your favorite player on the best team, but the player in the league who contributed most to his team through actual performance. I agree that, all things being equal, you should give the benefit of doubt to a player’s whose contributions helped his team win a division, but things are nowhere close to being equal in the AL. Mauer is having an historic season. Jeter is not. Nor is anyone else.
And Morales is hitting .301 with 30 HR, 98 RBI and a .930 OPS. Tex is hitting .286 with 35 HR, 112 RBI and a .932 OPS. Morales bats 7th. Tex bats third in an extreme hitter’s park with A-Roid behind him. Want to reconsider on Morales?
September 18, 2009 at 10:02 am |
Oh yeah, .309 is awful in the playoffs. So is the most career postseason hits, runs, and total bases. Thats a shitty record.
Why is Mauer having a historic season? which of his numbers are historic? His numbers as a catcher? How about the fact that he has only plyed in 121 games, and contributed nothing in those other games?
and how does Murphy’s season compare to the other rookie’s numbers?
September 18, 2009 at 10:10 am |
I didn’t say .309 was “shitty.” I said it was not an “elevation” from .317. And its obviously not. The “most career postseason hits, runs and total bases” stats are meaningless. They are nothing more than a byproduct of his total number of post season plate appearances.
How many catchers in baseball history have hit .374 with a 1.051 OPS? Only Piazza has put up numbers anywhere near that, and Mauer is a much better catcher than Piazza.
I actually suspect that the voters will get it right this year and vote for Mauer. But they will probably counter that and fuck-up the Cy-Young award by voting for CC rather than Grienke and King Felix.
September 18, 2009 at 10:18 am |
Oh and Tex’s “extreme hitter park” is 15th in hits per game, 19th in runs, and 28th in doubles.
Morales park: 16th in runs, 17th in hits, and 25th in doubles
So what besides HR makes Yankee stadium an “extreme hitters park”??
September 18, 2009 at 10:40 am |
And the Yankee pitching has nothing to do with that?
September 18, 2009 at 10:47 am |
By the way, look back at the 1999 Al MVP vote. Jeter lost to a bunch of juicers and Pedro.
September 18, 2009 at 11:09 am |
Look back at 2006, Jeter lost to Morneau who wasn’t even the second best guy on his own team.
September 18, 2009 at 11:06 am |
But Tex’s ability doesn’t?
and its not harder to hit in the post season? You have to be kidding me right? Facing the whole field, in the midst of a season is exactly the same as facing one of the 4 best teams in your league, who line up their pitching to face your team specifically?
September 18, 2009 at 11:18 am |
Of course the pitching is better in the playoffs. But the notion of Jeter “elevating his play” is bullshit nonetheless.
September 18, 2009 at 12:10 pm |
Big game Sunday night. That place is going to be a madhouse. Sold over 100,000 tickets. I don’t like the match-up for our D with the secondary nicked-up. But we should score some points on them as well.
September 18, 2009 at 12:25 pm |
Its not BS, There is a highlight reel full of stuff that has happened at critical moments in big games. One that stacks up with anyone playing. I just got the 60s-2000 WS on DVD. You remember Jeter setting the tone against al Leiter in the WS don’t you. You remember the play in oakland. You remember the double play in San Diego. You remember the 1996 2 run double in Atlanta. Just because its overhyped doesn’t make it untrue.
September 18, 2009 at 12:27 pm |
And Tony Romo is going to be running for his life. Sure the secondary is dinged, but he wont be sitting in there like he was against Tampa. Plus I think the DB can cover his bail out receiver Witten well enough to force Williams and Crayton to make plays against decent coverage.
September 18, 2009 at 12:50 pm |
Of course he has had great moments in the post-season. He’s played 120 something games, hasn’t he? What’s untrue is that he’s better in the playoffs or in big situations than he is otherwise. The numbers don’t support it. Nor does common sense. As I asked earlier: If he possesses the ability to “elevate his game” in big spots, why doesn’t he elevate it all the time? He’s an excellent player who performs in the playoffs and in big situations as an excellent player should — he’s excellent. This clutchiness stuff is a myth.
As for the Giants, their pass rushers like to pin back their ears and go after the QB. If you do that against Romo, you lose containment and he makes plays out of the pocket where he is at his best. Add in the banged up secondary and the hyped-up crowd, and I’m worried.
September 18, 2009 at 1:06 pm |
Elevated play in the post season means hitting .309 overall, with many series over .400-.500. elevating your play means hitting .300 when many guys drop to .220 hitters. Elevated play means ramping up your normal level of play to produce numbers which resemble what a good player can produce in a regular season.
With the Giants, I think his improvisiong out of the pocket will be limited a) because he has less time b) because guys like Kiwi and Pierce can keep contain on Witten, who usually bails Romo out, while the pressure is on the QB. The Giants are deadly edge rushers so running away from one guy means running into another guy from the backside.
With Osi at 260, and Tuck at 270 and Flozell and Leonard Davis at 350, thats a huge speed/quickness advantage. if they both get off at once, they have the closing speed to rush Romo all day. Kenny Phillips looked good in practice today too, which will help.
September 18, 2009 at 1:18 pm |
Last I checked, .309 is not higher than .317. Again: If he can turn on this switch which magically elevates his play in big situations, why doesn’t he just leave it turned on at all times? Why does he deprive the Yankees of such consistent greatness?
You should check out Joe Posnanski’s blog and read “It’s a Free Country” from 9/17. I just read it, and it covers a lot of what we’ve been discussing with Mauer and Jeter. Posnanski’s a bright guy, and a worthwhile read. He also wrote a very favorable article about Jeter last month that sounded like something I would have written. A Yankee fan friend of mine e-mailed it to me because it contained many of my favorite Jeter jokes while advocating him as an MVP candidate.
Where did u here that Phillips looked good in practice? I heard he looked good yesterday, but didn’t practice today. But not a reliance source.
PS: Server down at the office b/c of electrical problems caused by construction in the suite, can’t work on what I need to work on, so just surfing the web all day.
September 18, 2009 at 1:27 pm |
Just read that Phillips, Michael Johnson and Kevin Dockery all missed practice today. Oh shit.
September 18, 2009 at 1:32 pm |
Elevating in the playoffs means doing more just to hit .309. Again, you face the best pitching staffs (presumably) and teams have several games to adjust to you.
September 18, 2009 at 1:40 pm |
i read phillips and dockery out, johnson and boley in,
September 18, 2009 at 1:56 pm |
Even if I were to accept the premise that .309 in the playoffs is an “elevated performance” from .317 in the regular season, you have yet to answer why Jeter doesn’t elevate at all times and thus hit even better than .317 in the regular season.
Simply put, how is it that a player who possesses the ability to perform at a certain baseline level over thousands of at-bats magically become better during the playoffs or during certain at-bats? Does his vision improve? Do his reflexes improve? Does his bat speed increase? How does this magical transformation to superior player occur? And what control does Jeter have over the transformation? Does the presence of Joe Buck, Tim McCarver and red white and blue bunting at Yankee Stadium transform him to this super player like a full moon does a werewolf?
September 18, 2009 at 2:07 pm |
How about hitting better than most in a much smaller number of at-bats, with the most pressure, against a rotation aligned toward your team…rather than your total average throughout the entire season, when facing different pitchers and relievers, crappy teams, and throughout exponentially more AB?
You admit that unclutchness exists. so in your view the two states of postseason batting are unclutch and everything else. If you can be worse than average in critical situations (tightening up, swinging at bad pitches) why can you not be better than average (working counts, tiring a pitcher, shortening your swing).
The ability to play better than most in the biggest moments doesn’t mean a player doesn’t try as hard in regular moments. Elevating your play means relative to the field, not relative to your normal abilities. He rises when others shrink, he doesn’t change his skill set.
September 18, 2009 at 2:21 pm |
A player who hits better than most in big situations does so because he hits better than most in all situations. He doesn’t “rise.” He’s just a better player than most.
Jeter has had good “clutch” stats some years, and not so good “clutch” stats other years. If he has this superhuman ability to elevate his game, why did he fail to do so some years. He has also had some bad playoff series. Why didn’t he elevate during those series? Players generally perform over the course of their careers in “clutch” situations as they do in non-clutch situations, within a standard deviation. It’s just as simple as that. This clutch stuff is a myth. And while I believe players can be unclutch, I also believe it’s overstated. A person who can’t handle pressure would be weeded out long before he makes it to the major leagues.
And you should have been a lawyer.
September 18, 2009 at 2:24 pm |
Well this began as a football post, morphed into a discussion of Danielle Murphy, and became an argument over Jeter. i cant imagine going to trial for fraud and defending a murder by the summation
September 18, 2009 at 2:39 pm |
You should like Danny Murphy — hard-nosed, old-school, Irish kid. And check out Posnanski when you have a chance, if you haven’t already. He’s a guy worth reading. And his feelings for Jeter mirror mine. He constantly states how much he likes and respects Jeter, while simultaneously picking on Jeter due to the media infatuation.
Taking Erik to his first game tomorrow. Now he’ll get to tell his grandkids that he saw Tim Redding pitch.
September 18, 2009 at 2:51 pm |
I don’t know if you follow basketball, but its ahrd to imagine you dont know Jordan. He had a commercial a while back about how he has failed- again and again, with the game on the line. However, there is hardly a fan alive who would argue that jordan wasn’t clutch. He is the guy you want with the ball, when the game is on the line. Yes its because he had superior ability, and you want the best player to have the ball. But its also because not only did he have the best odds of scoring based on his skill set, he also had a knack for scoring when he had to. He failed a bunch of times, but so does everyone. Its his succeeding in big moment, moreso than most, which separates him.
While Jeter is not a player analog to Jordan in terms of ability, his ability as a clutch player is a fair comparison. People see Jeter as clutch. He is a guy people would like to see at bat with the game on the line. Its not like his stats in the playoffs make him a poor player. You are arguing that he doesn’t change who he is as a player in the playoffs, and that if he did, its a sign of failure in non-playoff situations. I disagree.
Look at Reggie Jackson. he didnt always excell in the playoffs. His post season average is .278. But, he also slugged over .500 in nine different playoff seasons. He hit .357 with 10 bombs in WS play. thats clutch.
try this formula- (tOPS RISP/ 2 outs) * 2) + (((tOPS Late and Close + tOPS Tie Game + tOPS Within 1 Run) /3) * 2) + ((post-season OPS/ regular season OPS) *100).
By this formula, the top 5 clutch hitters since 1956 are Mccovey, Aaron, Mantle, Stargell and Brett. Jeter finishes just slightly back. and thats just with the bat.
September 18, 2009 at 2:55 pm |
you seem to have some free time. Plow through this and let me know how Mauer comes out
http://members.tripod.com/bb_catchers/catchers/mcmartin.htm
September 19, 2009 at 8:04 pm |
Reggie Jackson’s WS stats: clutch or sample size? It’s the latter. If he had played 160 WS games, he would probably have hit about .275 with 35 homers. You don’t want Jeter up with the game on the line because he’s “clutch”, you want him up because he’s a .317 hitter. They are few and far between.
McCovey, Aaron, Mantle, Stargell and Brett are not the top 5 “clutch” hitters since 1956 because they were “clutch”, but because they were HOF players.
By the way, Murphy now has 598 career at-bats (a full season worth). He’s hitting .272 with 43 doubles and 12 homers. Not too “sucky.” I just hope the Mets spend their money elsewhere (left field, starting pitcher), and let the kid play first next year. .290 with 40 doubles and 10-15 homers is not an unreasonable projection for him, and I’ll gladly take that for a $400,000 player. But they will probably overpay someone who is not much, if any, better to appease the fans and media.
September 20, 2009 at 8:35 am |
Giants 27, Dallas 20.
September 21, 2009 at 9:37 am |
Quite the game last night. And Murphy is up to 35 doubles now, plus 4 triples.